Earlier this week, news broke from various media sources around the country, including The Washington Post, that the front doors of the United States Supreme Court would no longer be open to the public. The Court, citing security concerns, stated that effective immediately, visitors will enter the historic building on the plaza level, which includes security checkpoints.
This decision, like so many other decisions from the Court, includes dissenting opinions from more than one Justice. A Washington Post article states:
The changes have been debated for years and came with a dissent from two justices who expressed concern about altering the symbolic experience of visiting the 75-year-old building, designed by architect Cass Gilbert.
“The significance of the court’s front entrance extends beyond its design and function,” Justice Stephen G. Breyer wrote in a statement joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. “Writers and artists regularly use the steps to represent the ideal that anyone in this country may obtain meaningful justice through application to this Court. And the steps appear in countless photographs commemorating famous arguments or other moments of historical importance.
“In short, time has proven the success of Gilbert’s vision: To many members of the public, this court’s main entrance and front steps are not only a means to, but also a metaphor for, access to the court itself.”
Justice Breyer noted that he “knows of no other supreme court in the world that has closed its main entrance.”
I leave you with this to ponder….
Is it troubling to you that we are now barred from walking through the majestic doors of the highest court of this great country, where the above inscription reads “Equal Justice Under Law”?